This is a very interesting topic. The debate over security cameras is increasing so much because most people feel as though it is an invasion of privacy. I would like to see the perspective of a person whose life was saved because a security camera caught their assailant.
CCTV can be a useful tool to monitor places where it is unsafe for humans to enter as well as securing our streets. It is a little unsettling that "the eye in the sky" is watching and recording your every move, and there is much debate as to whether or not its use is an infringment of privacy; however, the good may outweigh the bad. Being able to bring a child murderer to justice, monitor movements of teens on a murderous rampage so that they may be aprehended before any more damage can be done may justify its use. Like my mother used to say to me as a child, if you don't do anything you're not supposed to be doing, then you have no cause to worry.
The conflict of CCTV and privacy should not be an issue. Unless of course companies and placing them in dressing rooms of stores. CCTV has helped capture people who have committed robberies of banks and gas stations. Targets video surveillance helped police determine what happened to a young lady leaving their store. She was abducted; the videos let the police know that she did disappear of her own free will. There are now cameras on some streets of Philadelphia to deter crime. Also, some traffic lights have cameras that take pictures of your license plate if you go through a red light. In these instances CCTV is an advantage for society. If you ask me, this is not an invasion of people’s privacy. Walking into any business it is expected that they have CCTV. CCTV used in the right way can only help society become a safer place.
I disagree, I for one don't like being constantly watched even when I'm not doing something wrong. I especially dislike it when I am doing something "wrong", I think it's ridiculous you can get traffic tickets now because cameras are constantly watching you. Where do you take a stand? Everywhere you go your being watched for the most part. Sooner or later its going to be like "Demolition Man" where you get fees for swearing in public - and you'll have to live underground to live like a real person with some privacy.
I'm 50/50 when It comes to CCTV. Society needs It to help make It a safe place but enough Is enough. It seems like the "big guy" Is watching everything we do, I think It's great that people can get tickets for running traffic lights but how come I never get a letter saying thank you for not running that traffic light. CCTV Is definitely needed in places like Philadelphia or any large city but If It gets into the wrong hands It can be nightmare. I can still recall the landlord in Philadelphia putting a form of CCTV all over the apartment so he could watch every move his tenant made. All In all I think when used properly It Is a great thing.
I think CCTV is overall for the better than the worse. I currently work for a prison and there are A LOT of incidents that happen where civilian and officer alike are backed up with there explanations due to the unrelenting CCTV. It is easy to think that people are generally good, but it just so happens some like to lie and try to get away with things. There have also been instances at my work place where injuries are proven to be completely bogus and are not awarded for the clever schemes. I think society benefits from those who try to get over on others but can't because of CCTV.
CCTV is definitely for the better, I think in a societal view it cause some major issues but so far we see them everywhere. Sometimes it is scary to know what really are they being used for and is the only reason to put them there is to find criminals. As a future reference, what will be next? Maybe it will stir up more argument on the issue of privacy.
I am personally against closed-circuit camera in public places. If a camera is in your business, it is your right as a business owner to protect your business. But as far as monitoring public places, I disagree. I feel that you have to weigh the risk of personal security and over privacy. I feel that this country was founded on privacy and freedom. Security cameras in public places are un-American to me. I just kind of think you need to take the risk. So what it solves a crime? How is a crime that I have nothing to do with, a right to invade my privacy? Most people won’t agree with my opinion. Oh well.
I like cc because it can be used to secure an area with less man power. Although it has its set backs in privacy issues, cc is a positive advancement for security. Some cities use these systems to control traffic violators and survey dangerous areas for criminal activity.
With the advancement in technology criminal procedures have also become more advanced. This is why the use of closed circuit TV as a means of security surveillance has increased in recent years. Closed circuit TV cameras are used for spy and surveillance purposes alike. These stealth cameras are sometimes disguised whereas at other times they are placed in obvious locations to ward of the security threat. Nonetheless it is the highly advanced low light monochrome camera that provides the ideal security back up.
This is a much needed invention. For security, it is more efficient to use cameras viewed by one person than multiple security guards. In stores, it is a great deterrent to shoplifting. For guarding a building such as a museum, any would-be thieves would be caught on camera before they are seen by the guards. In either situation, the footage is great evidence towards a conviction. Although it shouldn’t be used unless resources are lacking, this lends itself well to bluffs. In "The Da Vinci Code" (the book not the movie), there is a moment when the main character asks if the cameras in the Louvre were real. The answer was not all of them. Then again, it had a lock down mechanism if anything was taken.
security camera systems are becoming more popular in homes now. At work I have noticed an increase in people asking for webcams and such to monitor different areas of their home, and as front-door cameras and such. I find it a bit scary that I could be on camera everywhere I go... because the camera adds 10 pounds, right?
Security cameras are a necessity in life today. They are good for catching thieves in stores, homes and businesses. Everywhere you go now, there is a chance of someone watching your every move. This is an incredible invention and will be used for a very long time.
This is a very interesting topic. The debate over security cameras is increasing so much because most people feel as though it is an invasion of privacy. I would like to see the perspective of a person whose life was saved because a security camera caught their assailant.
ReplyDeleteCCTV can be a useful tool to monitor places where it is unsafe for humans to enter as well as securing our streets. It is a little unsettling that "the eye in the sky" is watching and recording your every move, and there is much debate as to whether or not its use is an infringment of privacy; however, the good may outweigh the bad. Being able to bring a child murderer to justice, monitor movements of teens on a murderous rampage so that they may be aprehended before any more damage can be done may justify its use. Like my mother used to say to me as a child, if you don't do anything you're not supposed to be doing, then you have no cause to worry.
ReplyDeleteThe conflict of CCTV and privacy should not be an issue. Unless of course companies and placing them in dressing rooms of stores. CCTV has helped capture people who have committed robberies of banks and gas stations. Targets video surveillance helped police determine what happened to a young lady leaving their store. She was abducted; the videos let the police know that she did disappear of her own free will. There are now cameras on some streets of Philadelphia to deter crime. Also, some traffic lights have cameras that take pictures of your license plate if you go through a red light. In these instances CCTV is an advantage for society. If you ask me, this is not an invasion of people’s privacy. Walking into any business it is expected that they have CCTV. CCTV used in the right way can only help society become a safer place.
ReplyDeleteI disagree, I for one don't like being constantly watched even when I'm not doing something wrong. I especially dislike it when I am doing something "wrong", I think it's ridiculous you can get traffic tickets now because cameras are constantly watching you. Where do you take a stand? Everywhere you go your being watched for the most part. Sooner or later its going to be like "Demolition Man" where you get fees for swearing in public - and you'll have to live underground to live like a real person with some privacy.
ReplyDeleteI'm 50/50 when It comes to CCTV. Society needs It to help make It a safe place but enough Is enough. It seems like the "big guy" Is watching everything we do, I think It's great that people can get tickets for running traffic lights but how come I never get a letter saying thank you for not running that traffic light. CCTV Is definitely needed in places like Philadelphia or any large city but If It gets into the wrong hands It can be nightmare. I can still recall the landlord in Philadelphia putting a form of CCTV all over the apartment so he could watch every move his tenant made. All In all I think when used properly It Is a great thing.
ReplyDeleteI think CCTV is overall for the better than the worse. I currently work for a prison and there are A LOT of incidents that happen where civilian and officer alike are backed up with there explanations due to the unrelenting CCTV. It is easy to think that people are generally good, but it just so happens some like to lie and try to get away with things. There have also been instances at my work place where injuries are proven to be completely bogus and are not awarded for the clever schemes. I think society benefits from those who try to get over on others but can't because of CCTV.
ReplyDeleteCCTV is definitely for the better, I think in a societal view it cause some major issues but so far we see them everywhere. Sometimes it is scary to know what really are they being used for and is the only reason to put them there is to find criminals. As a future reference, what will be next? Maybe it will stir up more argument on the issue of privacy.
ReplyDeleteI am personally against closed-circuit camera in public places. If a camera is in your business, it is your right as a business owner to protect your business. But as far as monitoring public places, I disagree. I feel that you have to weigh the risk of personal security and over privacy. I feel that this country was founded on privacy and freedom. Security cameras in public places are un-American to me. I just kind of think you need to take the risk. So what it solves a crime? How is a crime that I have nothing to do with, a right to invade my privacy? Most people won’t agree with my opinion. Oh well.
ReplyDeleteI like cc because it can be used to secure an area with less man power. Although it has its set backs in privacy issues, cc is a positive advancement for security. Some cities use these systems to control traffic violators and survey dangerous areas for criminal activity.
ReplyDeleteWith the advancement in technology criminal procedures have also become more advanced. This is why the use of closed circuit TV as a means of security surveillance has increased in recent years. Closed circuit TV cameras are used for spy and surveillance purposes alike. These stealth cameras are sometimes disguised whereas at other times they are placed in obvious locations to ward of the security threat. Nonetheless it is the highly advanced low light monochrome camera that provides the ideal security back up.
ReplyDeleteThis is a much needed invention. For security, it is more efficient to use cameras viewed by one person than multiple security guards. In stores, it is a great deterrent to shoplifting. For guarding a building such as a museum, any would-be thieves would be caught on camera before they are seen by the guards. In either situation, the footage is great evidence towards a conviction. Although it shouldn’t be used unless resources are lacking, this lends itself well to bluffs. In "The Da Vinci Code" (the book not the movie), there is a moment when the main character asks if the cameras in the Louvre were real. The answer was not all of them. Then again, it had a lock down mechanism if anything was taken.
ReplyDeletesecurity camera systems are becoming more popular in homes now. At work I have noticed an increase in people asking for webcams and such to monitor different areas of their home, and as front-door cameras and such. I find it a bit scary that I could be on camera everywhere I go... because the camera adds 10 pounds, right?
ReplyDeleteSecurity cameras are a necessity in life today. They are good for catching thieves in stores, homes and businesses. Everywhere you go now, there is a chance of someone watching your every move. This is an incredible invention and will be used for a very long time.
ReplyDelete